Segio
Leone’s 1966 The Good, the Bad and the Ugly is a staple in
the Western film genre. This reputation is cemented not only through
the recognized conventions that are adhered to but the visual and
characterizing tropes it invents in order to create a unique
cinematic identity. The use of iconic mise-en-scene while
subverting the status quo morality creates an effective
juxtaposition which revolutionized the genre.
One convention that the film has utilized from the Western genre
mythology is the highly realistic mise-en-scene, paying close
attention to historical accuracy of the era. Examining the climactic
showdown duel between the three titular characters, there is a great
deal of effort in order to authenticate this visual, such as location
filming rather than a studio-bound set and incredibly detailed,
period-accurate costumes and props. This lack of artistic stylization
but an attempt at graphic realism creates an evocative atmosphere
which has been a trope expressing the American frontier, featured
heavily in the genre’s canon, seen in classic Westerns such as John
Ford’s 1939 film Stagecoach and John Sturges’ 1960 film
The Magnificent Seven.
This expression of the American frontier embodies many recognizable
elements central to the genre ideology. These elements include a
sense of lawlessness, rugged terrain which characters can struggle
against, and a setting on the outskirts of civilization. As Sergio
Leone said, the setting is a place “where life had no value, death,
sometimes had its price”. This expression helps to facilitate the
contextualization of the story. An example of this is the anarchic
set-up of the mechanisms that lead up to the showdown. The gravitas
of these three characters duelling for the $200,000 permeates
through the countless ordeals that they have had to deal with to get
to the graveyard platform, including Tuco forcing Blondie to march
through the barren desert until exhaustion and Angel Eyes torturing
Tuco in a prison camp. These ordeals could only have achieved such
dramatic tenure in such a context as the frontier as they can be seen
as both abhorrent and yet perfectly standard.
Another convention from the genre mythology that this film employs
readily is the use of the revolver. Revolvers fit in with the
historical accuracy of the film but also embody a sense of
enablement. The trio all, at one time or another, use a revolver as a
means of fashioning a form of control over someone. This develops the
revolver as an artefact that brings power to the user. By the time of
the showdown scene, not only do all three have revolvers but they all
keep them in their belt holsters. This promotes an idea that these
men have power, but this power is equalled by their opponents.
Another factor in deciding the film’s revered status as a Western
relies upon the inventions it creates for the genre. One example of
an invention is the characterization of Blondie who, in the showdown,
has adopted a traditional poncho for himself; a piece of costume
which has a very ethnic connotation to it. Traditionally, Western
films portrayed ethnic characters with a degree of hostility and
savageness. This poncho creates a contrast with the archetype of the
Western protagonist being a sympathetic character with an
understandable honour and code. The result of this contrast leads to
a sense of moral ambiguity, as it can be seen as an inversion of the
expectations that the protagonist shoulders.
This inversion of the protagonist also relates to the characters
having a high degree of moral relativity. Films like Stagecoach
created entirely oppositional protagonists and antagonists, with the
protagonists being virtuous figures with those pitted against them
are emphasised as evil, and often, unsavoury characters. Here,
Blondie, Tuco and Angel Eyes are perfectly willing to shoot each
other for a monetary reward with little differentiation between their
motives, subverting the diametric readings that the audience might
rely upon in order to find an empathetic character. This can be seen
as an evolution of the character-driven conflict as it builds more
ambiguity and character depth, creating a less clearly defined
spectacle of the crossover of personas and furnishing more complex
ideas about the men.
Another way in which the film breaks new ground on the genre is in
the cinematography. In other classic Western films, such as Howard
Hawks’ 1940 film Red River, a crescendo of action was often
signalled by the use of indicative high and low camera angles for the
protagonist and antagonist respectively, and a smooth movements in
order to capture a sense of swift flow in the event. In the standoff
in the climax of The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, the three
characters are framed more or less identically with static cameras,
using very level close-up shots. This uniform framing contributes to
the establishment in the similarities the characters’ motives. To
accommodate for the lack of camera movement to flow, through editing
the pace of the scene is kept at a fast pace.
The combination of both keeping to the usual conventions of the
genre, while inventing new ones, keeps the film innovative by having
a recognizably Western identity, while averting many obvious
cornerstones which produce compelling cinematic moments. The showdown
scene has a large amount of tension due to the triumvirate nature of
the showdown rather than the traditional two-man duel, having an
amount of uncertainty as who each man might shoot. The trope of the
duel as a way of climaxing the film is an extremely familiar one;
using three people adds another layer to the suspense.
Leone knew the Western genre very well but did not find it necessary
to keep all of his techniques into simple cut-and-paste criteria. He
took what strands of the genre’s conventions he thought best
benefited the film’s tangled storyline and wove these strands with
other influences which were deemed to engage an audience. Covered in
sauce, it is these strands which make the film appropriate for its
classification in a subgenre- the Spaghetti Western.
No comments:
Post a Comment